Congrats to Raymond Tolentino, Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, and co-authors who have published an article entitled Curriculum frameworks and educational programs in AI for medical students, residents, and practicing physicians: Scoping review in JMIR Medical Education.
Background: The successful integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice is contingent upon physicians’ comprehension of AI principles and its applications. Therefore, it is essential for medical education curricula to incorporate AI topics and concepts, providing future physicians with the foundational knowledge and skills needed. However, there is a knowledge gap in the current understanding and availability of structured AI curriculum frameworks tailored for medical education, which serve as vital guides for instructing and facilitating the learning process.
Objective: The overall aim of this study is to synthesize knowledge from the literature on curriculum frameworks and current educational programs that focus on the teaching and learning of AI for medical students, residents, and practicing physicians. Methods: We followed a validated framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for scoping reviews. An information specialist performed a comprehensive search from 2000 to May 2023 in the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Scopus as well as the gray literature. Papers were limited to English and French languages. This review included papers that describe curriculum frameworks for teaching and learning AI in medicine, irrespective of country. All types of papers and study designs were included, except conference abstracts and protocols. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, read the full texts, and extracted data using a validated data extraction form. Disagreements were resolved by consensus, and if this was not possible, the opinion of a third reviewer was sought. We adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting the results.
Results: Of the 5104 papers screened, 21 papers relevant to our eligibility criteria were identified. In total, 90% (19/21) of the papers altogether described 30 current or previously offered educational programs, and 10% (2/21) of the papers described elements of a curriculum framework. One framework describes a general approach to integrating AI curricula throughout the medical learning continuum and another describes a core curriculum for AI in ophthalmology. No papers described a theory, pedagogy, or framework that guided the educational programs.
Conclusions: This review synthesizes recent advancements in AI curriculum frameworks and educational programs within the domain of medical education. To build on this foundation, future researchers are encouraged to engage in a multidisciplinary approach to curriculum redesign. In addition, it is encouraged to initiate dialogues on the integration of AI into medical curriculum planning and to investigate the development, deployment, and appraisal of these innovative educational programs.
Related Articles
The Three Talk Model of Shared Decision Making … Simple yet Complex
FMER Advanced Research Seminars:The Three Talk Model of Shared Decision Making ... Simple yet ComplexThank you so much, Glyn Elwyn BA MD MSc PhD FRCGP! On behalf of all the e-attendees, we extend our sincere gratitude for your wonderful webinar.Date: November 26,...
Institute of Health Sciences Education Graduate Programs Open House
Join us at the Institute of Health Sciences Education for an Open House to learn about our graduate program offering for 2025-2026.
What does it mean to join a team or be a good collaborator? | Ask 5
This month on Ask 5, our aspiring researchers discuss what it means to join a team, be a good collaborator and how to make a ‘fair’ contribution. Check it out as our guests share their golden nuggets of knowledge.